Tests & reviews

Nemo - Switchback - Sleeping mat tested

Reviews overview

Our reviews are 100% genuine.
89%
recommend this product
Reviews
    • (7)
    • (1)
    • (1)
    • 2 stars
      (0)
    • 1 star
      (0)

What do you think about that?

You have reached the max. number of characters.

Oops! You forgot to ask your question.

Click the number of stars to complete your review of this product

Click the number of stars to complete your review of this product

What is your review for this product?
(Click stars for your review mark)
Upload image

By completing this upload you confirm our Terms of Use

This is what customers from around the world say:

Ivo
15.07.2023

87% have found the reviews
by Ivo helpful

  • Advantages
    Robust Lightweight
  • Disadvantages
    Packed dimensions
Tim
16.09.2023

100% have found the reviews
by Tim helpful

  • Advantages
    Lightweight Robust Price / performance Insulates well Easy to pack up
Simon
15.09.2023

100% have found the reviews
by Simon helpful

  • Advantages
    Compact Comfortable
Neal
02.07.2025

  • Advantages
    Lightweight Price / performance Surface not slippery Robust
Valts
15.05.2026
Why I'm Returning the Nemo Switchback

Placing both pads side by side and testing them, I conclude that I would rather choose the Thermarest Z Lite Sol option.

There are several reasons for this.

The most significant one - the Nemo Switchback design is pretty but impractical from a comfort standpoint; the pressure points are sparse and located in small groups. On the Thermarest, they are evenly distributed across the entire mat. Consequently, Nemo's pressure points dig into the body significantly more. I sleep on my stomach and have a minimal body fat percentage, so I can feel these comfort differences very precisely and objectively. The analogy - sitting on one nail or ten. The more there are, covering a larger area, the less pressure you feel on each of them. For this reason, the Nemo version is less comfortable.

Also, the material of the Nemo mat is slightly firmer; accordingly, the protrusions are harder and less comfortable.

The second reason - as strange as it may be, the Nemo mat is relatively loud. When tossing and turning, its composition creates sounds for some reason, whereas the Thermarest is almost completely silent.

The third reason - the Nemo version is 30 grams heavier.

The fourth reason - Nemo has manufactured its mat with the idea that the foil layer faces the ground, not the sleeper. Thermarest has designed it the other way around. As a result, at least at the level of sensation, the Thermarest feels slightly warmer because it immediately reflects body heat back to the sleeper.

I wanted to replace my old Thermarest with the new, visually more attractive Nemo, but instead, I will continue using my old mat and send the Nemo back to the seller. It’s a pity, because the product really does look good visually, but it is less practical.

  • Advantages
    Compact Easy to pack up
  • Disadvantages
    Heavy Not comfortable
Petra
30.12.2025

  • Advantages
    Lightweight Robust
  • Disadvantages
    Packed dimensions
Jorge
30.01.2025
Great

Great

  • Advantages
    Robust Lightweight
  • Disadvantages
    Packed dimensions
zoltin
05.07.2024

  • Advantages
    Insulates well Lightweight Surface not slippery Price / performance Easy to pack up Robust
  • Disadvantages
    Packed dimensions
Robbert
10.07.2023

  • Advantages
    Insulates well Compact Lightweight