Ortovox - Peak 35 - Mountaineering backpack
At a glance
Material information & features
- Suitable for:
- Recommended use:
- alpine touring
- Main material:
- 100% polyamide
- Inserts:
- 100% wool
- Material type:
- polyamide
- Material note:
- contains recycled polyamide
- Material thickness:
- 420 denier
- Fabric properties:
- abrasion-resistant, tear-resistant
- Other material information:
- ripstop
- Carry system:
- chest strap, padded shoulder straps, padded hip belt
- Main compartment access:
- frontloader
- Additional features:
- ice axe/pole holder, helmet carrier, map compartment, avalanche tool organizer, front zip pocket, ski/snowboard carry system, crampon compartment
- Hydration system:
- compatible
- Volume:
- 35 l
- Weight:
- 1,500 g
- Reference size:
- One Size
- Extras:
- incl. emergency whistle, compression straps
- Misc:
- A/D Skifix
- Item No.:
- 503-0987
Reviews overview
Disadvantages
This is what other customers say:
Seems well put together with some thoughtful features. Hard to fault. Has all the storage space needed for Ski Touring.
--- review of an older model ---
-
- Advantages
- Good adjustment options
- Useful details
- Good storage options
- Comfortable to carry
I've had Ortovox for years. So I was above Zermatt and a friend had a serious accident. The Cervinia patrol arrived, who were brilliant. And they all had Ortovox Peak rucksacks.
I obtained the Peak 35 to rest my 20 year old Ortovox Stratus 32, which is still pretty perfect. But the Peak 35 is much more modern, a better fit, sleeker, and great for carrying in the mountains. Doesn't quite fit some airlines as carry on, but that is the only drawback.
Plenty of other brands are available, but Ortovox is to me the finest. And I'm not the only judge. Just ask the people who really know - Cervinia mountain Rescue!
--- review of an older model ---
-
- Advantages
- Comfortable to carry
-
- Disadvantages
- Doesnt quite fit as carry on
There are 56 more threads!